Before commitment
Will this work for me, or only for the person in the testimonial?
An ecosystem of evidence, support and intelligence
An ecosystem of evidence, support and intelligence for members, trainers, clubs, and clinics. What follows is a sample.
Sample · A decision
Evidence qualifiedOne decision from a wider set. Weak evidence does not contaminate the rest.
Who it is for · a sample of the set
Members
Progress without false precision.
Trainers
Evidence-linked observations, without reviewing every recording.
Operators
A differentiated experience on ordinary phones.
Partners
A framework that future systems can join, not replace.
More use cases exist. This page shows a few, to give the idea.
The principle
Not another fitness camera, body scanner, or generic scoring app. A disciplined visual measurement system. A video holds useful information about movement, alignment, proportions, and progression. It also holds variation from camera, light, clothing, occlusion, and the model. Most systems treat a recording as usable or unusable, then produce a number. This system asks, for each metric, whether the evidence is there.
Observe
What the camera can actually see in this capture.
Qualify
Which measurements can be computed, and how uncertain each is.
Decide
Report, withhold, defer, or ask for a specific recapture.
How a result is decided
01
Reliable
How reliable was the measurement in this session?
02
Comparable
How comparable is it with earlier sessions?
03
Enough
Is the difference larger than the expected variation for this person and metric?
A partially obscured video may still support tempo and range, even when it cannot support width or alignment. Early weeks may answer from control, range, load, and consistency. A body-size result appears only when the difference exceeds the validated variation. Relevance alone is not enough.
A sample of the resources
Visual product design
Guided capture, real-time feedback, clear uncertainty.
Computer vision
Pose, segmentation, movement detection, frame selection.
Mobile edge AI
On-device inference, performance, privacy.
Measurement science
Biomechanics, anthropometry, metric definitions.
Statistics and validation
Reliability, personalized noise floors, change detection.
Data and MLOps
Annotation, versioning, testing, monitoring.
Privacy and security
Consent, retention, deletion. Raw media can leave after extraction.
More exists. This is a portion, to give the idea.
A starting point
Before commitment
Will this work for me, or only for the person in the testimonial?
After commitment
I have been showing up, and I cannot see it. The scale is flat. The mirror is a bad witness.
Planner
The plan. Sets, reps, a progression.
Proof the week happened, on the body that did it.
Scanner · ScanPro
A still. A 3D body, a body-fat number, a report a gym can hand over.
The rep, going beyond the still. Next week still has to change because of the photo.
Form app · FlexifyMe
The pose. A rep score, or a call.
Progress for healthy lifters, across a block, beyond rehab.
Human coach
The rep, in the session. Judgment, and a relationship.
A witness for the days between sessions. The same frame, every week.
Machine · EGYM
The rep, on its machine.
One record across the whole floor, not only the machine that logged it.
Morph
A body. A projection.
Real progress. Never a projected body. The photo stays the photo.
Position
Each tool sees part of the picture. RepsEye is an ecosystem that writes the work into a record, for the person, the trainer, or the club.
ScanPro owns the still. FlexifyMe owns the pose. Mindbody owns the club. EGYM owns the machine. The high-high space, movement and the whole club, is open. RepsEye is built for it.
How a week moves
Capture is guided, and a bad setup is rejected on the phone. The first lifts are a squat pattern, a hinge, a horizontal push, and a horizontal pull. One cue. If the angle cannot support a read, there is no score. Those four moments are one member’s week. The ledger is the only way a week is allowed to change what the next person is told.
01
02
03
04
The record
A missed week does not get a kinder image. A flat scale does not get a morph. The sentence has to be something a coach would say out loud.
Sessions are complete. The overlay shows a shoulder change the member had not named. The sentence is the product. Load is up. The waist photo is not.
Load is up. Waist photo is unchanged. Shoulders have moved.
Next block keeps the press and shortens the conditioning.
Sunday lineकंधे आगे बढ़े। कमर नहीं। अगला हफ़्ता पहले से समायोजित है।
Shoulders moved. waist still.
A registration frame. The regions are named. The photo stays the photo.
Week 12 card
Intake visualization beside the real photo
The promise and the photo disagree. That disagreement is shown. It is the reason a member can stay through a flat scale without being sold a kinder picture.
The plan changes, or the adherence conversation does. The picture is not improved.
Form
A sample of movement metrics. Each clip shows what can be observed, and the signal a camera would use. A metric is reported only when its evidence requirements are met.
17 form · 3 tempo · 3 session · 12 male · 11 female
Lower-body strength and core stability
Goblet squat · Female figure · Front view
Back squat · Male figure · Side view
Back squat · Female figure · Side view
Posterior-chain strength
Deadlift · Male figure · Side view
Deadlift · Female figure · Side view
Kettlebell swing · Male figure · Side view
Upper-body pressing strength
Push-up · Female figure · Top view
Overhead press · Male figure · Side view
Overhead press · Female figure · Side view
Push-up · Male figure · Side view
Upper-body pulling strength and posture
Bent-over row · Female figure · Side view
Pull-up · Male figure · Front view
Bent-over row · Female figure · Side view
Pull-up · Male figure · Side view
Anti-extension and anti-rotation
Forearm plank · Female figure · Side view
Dead bug · Male figure · Side view
Forearm plank · Male figure · Side view
Cardio and metabolic fitness
Run start · Female figure · Side view
Running · Male figure · Side view
Range of motion and joint health
Deep squat test · Male figure · Side view
Standing forward fold · Female figure · Side view
Stability and proprioception
Single-leg RDL · Female figure · Side view
Single-leg stance · Male figure · Front view
Form faults show inside a single rep. Tempo faults only show over time, in the signal strip. Session faults are about what a person does or skips across a workout, so video alone cannot prove them. Figures are schematic; angles are exaggerated so each fault reads at a glance.
The Indian context
Strong, athletic, and pleasing are allowed only inside what lasts and what does not hurt. The order is fixed. Lasting, then strong, then proportion. Pain ends the score. The rate caps the picture. These figures stay chart v1 until a person signs a later version. That argument is the ledger, not this calculator.
The Indian risk sits at the waist, often while a Western chart still calls the BMI normal.
Asian Indian adults
18.5–22.9 narrower normal. 23–24.9 overweight. ≥25 obesity. Under 18.5 is not a leanness goal.
Sets whether a block may talk about a smaller waist at all. Under 18.5, the block feeds the work. It does not shrink the picture.
Does not stage disease, and does not use the Western 25 / 30 chart.
Misra et al., Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 2009;57:163–170. The 2025 India Obesity Commission starts increased adiposity above BMI 23 and does not ask RepsEye to diagnose stage 2.
Women and men, measured at the abdomen
Action level: women ≥80 cm, men ≥90 cm.
The first regional note when the member is outside it. Shoulders can be named only after this is faced.
Will not quote the Western action levels of 88 cm and 102 cm. Those are the wrong body.
Misra et al., JAPI, 2009. The same waist levels are the ones the Indian discussion still uses.
Any adult, using their own height
Keep the waist under half the height. Bound: 0.50.
The personal number. A 5′2″ member and a 6′ member do not share a waist target. The projection may not draw a waist smaller than this bound unless the photo has already gone there.
Not a tailor’s ideal. Not a reason to keep cutting once the member is under it.
Ashwell M, Gibson S. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010159. The 2025 Indian definition includes waist-to-height alongside waist; RepsEye uses 0.50 and does not invent a tighter private cutoff.
Women and men
Raised-risk action: women ≥0.85, men ≥0.90.
Secondary. A larger hip can hide a high waist inside this ratio, so the waist and the height come first.
Not an hourglass target.
World Health Organization. Waist circumference and waist–hip ratio: report of a WHO expert consultation. Geneva, 2008.
Older Asian adults, as a floor
Low strength: women under 18 kg, men under 28 kg.
Lasting muscle, not a Sunday physique score. For the 22–40 beachhead it is a floor to know. It is not the weekly card.
Not a test RepsEye infers from a photo.
Chen et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2020;21(3):300–307.
Older Asian adults, screening only
Screen for low muscle: women under 33 cm, men under 34 cm.
A floor for muscle that lasts. It is not a calf size to build toward.
Will not turn a sarcopenia screen into an aesthetic target.
Chen et al., AWGS 2019, JAMDA 2020.
How it learns
Two feeds. Member weeks, as counts. Research, as a slip a person can sign. Neither feed is a photo. Neither feed is allowed to improve a picture already issued. This desk is a worked example. It forgets when you leave.
01
The path is named under a chart version: the dose, the assumption, and what it refused. The check uses the card that was issued, not a later opinion.
02
A followed week has the sessions at that dose and a Sunday frame the camera accepted. A miss, a pain stop, and a bad camera are stored, then excluded.
03
Each followed week is ahead, inside, or behind that original card. Eight followed weeks, and at least six in ten of them the same way, before a change can even be proposed.
04
A person signs the next chart, or refuses the slip. Lasting lines do not move on member weeks. Issued cards are not recomputed. Photos never enter.
Issued cards stay on the version they were promised. Women 80 cm, men 90 cm. Waist under half the height. BMI floor 18.5, band from 23, obesity from 25. No body-fat percentage.
Paths issued under chart v1
File a week on this path
6 of 8 followed weeks landed behind the novice push aim. The next chart may lower that aim one step. It cannot move the waist lines, and it cannot redraw a shoulder.
Research slips
Unsourced lookbook
Unsigned
Waist under 0.45 of height reads as more athletic.
A tighter ratio with no source is a look. The only signature is a refusal.
A US product chart
Unsigned
Use 88 cm for women and 102 cm for men so the app matches an international tool.
A Western action level is not a correction for this body.
India Obesity Commission, 2025
Unsigned
Increased adiposity begins above BMI 23. The commission does not ask this product to diagnose a stage.
The band is already on the card. Signing adds the citation. It does not add a diagnosis.
Physique-coaching rate note
Unsigned
When adherence is new, cap a fat-loss picture at about 0.25% of body mass a week.
It can be signed only after the fat-loss path earns it, or held until then. It cannot speed a picture up.
What this sitting changed
Nothing filed yet. The opening read is already a check: the recomp path held, the novice press is ready to sign down one step, and the waist lines are not open for negotiation.
Sources on this chart
Who it serves
Members first, in one city, on one goal. Trainers next, because the close is the case study. Gyms after that, with a holdout. Employers last, and blind to body images by default.
Meera, 29, Bengaluru
Trains three times a week. Has quit two apps and one trainer. Cannot tell if her shoulders have changed.
How it is offered
If a member hesitates to take the Sunday photo because it costs something, the product is already broken. Meter extra projection scenarios if a meter is required. Do not meter the week.
Beachhead
The member
₹699
a month, working price
Next
The trainer or the studio
Per client
plus a platform fee
Pilot
The operator
Per site
or per active member
Corporate wellness is a later door: per employee per year, adherence only, no body images unless the employee opts in. No revenue target is set for year one. It is a proof year.
Lines the brand will not say
To a member
Dream body. Guaranteed transformation. Medical-grade fat.
To a trainer
The app replaces you. The picture is the result.
To a gym
Footfall, dwell, or shares are how we will know it worked.
To an employer
Company-level body-composition outcomes.
How it is held
What is stored, for how long, and who at a gym or an employer can ever see it is said at capture. The default is no one.
The rate a projection may show is a rule, not a prompt. Marketing cannot outrun it. A later chart does not retouch a card already issued. Photos are not how the chart learns.
Once the week-12 card is generated, it is not retouched. Public case studies are opt-in. There is no public transformation feed.
Age gate at 18. No minor body imagery. No prompts aimed at extreme leanness, or at someone else’s body. Distress routes to a stop-and-refer screen.
How it begins
The decision to continue is week-4 paid retention against a plan-only control, and whether people actually take the Sunday photo.
Weeks 0–2
Capture protocol, the Indian chart, and the ledger floor. Eight followed weeks on a path before that path may move a chart. Reviewed with two trainers.
Weeks 3–6
Closed beta, about fifty members. Weekly proof completion is the only north star.
Weeks 7–12
Paid trial. Week-4 retention against a plan-only control in the same app.
Then
Continue, narrow, or stop. On proof completion and week-4 paid retention. Not on downloads.
A conversation, not a waitlist
Same facts, different job. Pick who is in the room. The brief carries the line they can repeat, and the line this brand will not say. It stays on this device until you copy it.
RepsEye
Every record we show is one the member made. Intake on one side. Week 12 on the other. Next week comes from that pair.